The Fifth Column of Democracy
It is my intention to keep my BLOG inspirational and informative - to provide news and views that assist us in becoming all we can be...but as I wrote in 1996 in my book, Vision of the Grail, there is a worldwide consolidation of the media that is alarming. This is something that we must be aware of and join in efforts to counteract so that we are not swallowed up and watch our freedoms erode. The Internet is one of the last bastions of freedom of information, and if we lose that, we are totally at the mercy of spin doctors who will feed us whatever is in their best interest, not necessarily ours. This thoughtful column by Bill Moyers makes the point. Editor
Estate a Fifth Column? Choctaw County Oklahoma Texas Washington U.S. Baltimore Baltimore Maryland Iraq Washington
Friday 11 July 2008
by: Bill Moyers
Corporate media colludes with democracy's demise.
I heard this story a long time ago, growing up in
in
telling his grandson about the battle the old man was waging within
himself. He said, "It is between two wolves, my son. One is an evil
wolf: anger, envy, sorrow, greed, self-pity, guilt, resentment, lies,
false pride, superiority and ego. The other is the good wolf: joy,
peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, empathy, generosity, truth,
compassion and faith."
The boy took this in for a few minutes and then asked his
grandfather, "Which wolf won?"
The old Cherokee replied simply, "The one I feed."
Democracy is that way. The wolf that wins is the one we feed. And
in our society, media provides the fodder.
Our media institu tions, deeply embedded in the power structures of
society, are not providing the information that we need to make our
democracy work. To put it another way, corporate media consolidation
is a corrosive social force. It robs people of their voice in public
affairs and pollutes the political culture. And it turns the debates
about profound issues into a shouting match of polarized views
promulgated by partisan apologists who trivialize democracy while
refusing to speak the truth about how our country is being plundered.
Our dominant media are ultimately accountable only to corporate
boards whose mission is not life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
for the whole body of our republic, but the aggrandizement of
corporate executives and shareholders.
These organizations' self-styled mandate is not to hold public and
private power accountable, but to aggregate their interlocking
interests. Their reward is not to help fulfill the social compact
embodied in the notion of "We, the people," but to manufacture news
and information as profitable consumer commodities.
Democracy without honest information creates the illusion of
popular consent at the same time that it enhances the power of the
state and the privileged interests that the state protects. And
nothing characterizes corporate media today more than its disdain
toward the fragile nature of modern life and its indifference toward
the complex social debate required of a free and self-governing
people.
Let's look at what is happening with the Internet. This spring the
cable giant Comcast tried to pack a Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) hearing on network neutrality by hiring strangers off the street
to ensure that advocates of net neutrality would not be able to get a
seat in the hearing room.
SaveTheInternet.com - a bipartisan coalition - and its supporters
helped expose the ruse. Soon after, there was a new hearing, this time
without the gerrymandering seating by opponents of an open Internet.
Now Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) has introduced a bill to advance
network neutrality, and it has become an issue in the presidential
campaign.
We must be vigilant. The fate of the cyber-commons - the future of
the mobile Web and the benefits of the Internet as open architecture -
is up for grabs. And the only antidote to the power of organize d money
in
When Verizon tried to censor NARAL's (National Abortion Rights
Action League) use of text messaging last year, it was quick action by
Save the Internet that led the company to reverse its position. Those
efforts also led to an FCC proceeding on this issue.
Wherever the Internet flows - on PCs, cell phones, mobile devices
and, very soon, new digital television sets - we must ensure that it
remains an open and nondiscriminatory medium of expression.
By 2011, the market analysts tell us, the Internet will surpass
newspapers in advertising revenues. With MySpace and Dow Jones
controlled by News Corporation's Rupert Murdoch, Microsoft determined
to acquire Yahoo!, and with advertisers already telling some bloggers,
"Your content is unacceptable," we could potentially lose what's now
considered an unstoppable long tail of content offering abundant, new,
credible and sustainable sources of news and information.
So, what will happen to news in the future, as the already
tattered boundaries between journalism and advertising is dispensed
with entirely and as content programming, commerce and online
communities are rolled into one profitably attractive package?
Last year, the investment firm of Piper Jaffray predicted that
much of the business model for new media would be just that kind of
hybrid. They called it "communitainment." (Oh, George Orwell, where
are you now that we need you?)
Across the media landscape, the health of our democracy is
imperiled. Buffeted by gale force winds of technological, political
and demographic forces, without a truly free and independent press,
this 250-year-old experiment in self-government will not make it. As
journalism goes, so goes democracy.
Mergers and buyouts change both old and new media. They bring a
frenzied focus on cost-cutting, while fattening the pockets of the new
owners and their investors. The result: journalism is degraded through
the layoffs and buyouts of legions of reporters and editors.
Advertising Age reports that
15-year low. The Los Angeles Times alone has experienced a withering
series of resignations by editors who refused to turn a red pencil
into an editorial scalpel.
The new owner of the Tribune Company, real estate mogul Sam Zell,
recently toured his new property Los Angeles Times, telling employees
in the newsroom that the challenge is this: How do we get somebody 126
years old to get it up? "Well," said Zell, "I'm your Viagra."
He told his journalists that he didn't have an editorial agenda or
a perspective about newspapers' roles as civic institutions. "I'm a
businessman," he said. "All what matters in the end is the bottom
line."
Zell then told Wall Street analysts that to save money he intends
to eliminate 500 pages of news a week across all of the Tribune
Company's 12 papers. That can mean eliminating some 82 editorial pages
every week just from the Los Angeles Times. What will he use to
replace reporters and editors? He says to the Wall Street analysts,
"I'll use maps, graphics, lists, rankings and stats." Sounds as if
Zell has confused Viagra with Lunesta.
Former
David Simon, chronicled the effect that crosscutting and consolidation
has had in media businesses and on the communities where tho se
businesses have made so much money. He wrote in a Washington Post
op-ed, "I did not encounter a sustained period in which anyone
endeavored to spend what it would actually cost to make the
Sun the most essential and deep-thinking and well-written account of
life in central
kind of storytelling were ushered out the door, buyout after buyout."
Or as journalist Eric Alterman recently wrote in the New Yorker:
"It is impossible not to wonder what will become of not just news but
democracy itself, in a world in which we can no longer depend on
newspapers to invest their unmatched resources and professional pride
in helping the rest of us to learn, however imperfectly, what we need
to know."
For example, we needed to know the truth about
could have spared that country from rack and ruin, saved thousands of
American lives and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, and freed
hundreds of billions of dollars for investment in the American economy
and infrastructure.
But as reporters at Knight Ridder - one of the few organizations
that systematically and independently set out to challenge the claims
of the administration - told us at the time, and as my colleagues and
I reported in our PBS documentary Buying the War, and as Scott
McClellan has now confessed, and as the Senate Intelligence Committee
confirmed in June, the Bush administration deceived Americans into
supporting an unprovoked war on another country. And it did so using
erroneous and misleading intelligence - and with the complicity of the
domin ant media. It has led to a conflict that, instead of being over
quickly and bloodlessly as predicted, continues to this day into its
sixth year.
We now know that a neoconservative is an arsonist who sets a house
on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out. You
couldn't find a more revealing measure of the state of the dominant
media today than the continuing ubiquitous presence on the air and in
print of the very pundits and experts, self-selected message
multipliers of a disastrous foreign policy, who got it all wrong in
the first place. It just goes t o show, when the bar is low enough, you
can never be too wrong.
The dominant media remains in denial about their role in passing
on the government's unverified claims as facts. That's the great
danger. It's not simply that they dominate the story we tell ourselves
publicly every day. It's that they don't allow other alternative
competing narratives to emerge, against which the people could measure
the veracity of all the claims.
Now the dominant media is saying, "Well, we did ask. We did do our
job by asking tough questions during the run-up to the war."
But I've been through the transcripts. And I'll tell you, you will
find very few tough questions. And if you come across them, you will
discover that they were asked of the wrong people.
John Walcott,
Knight Ridder, recently said of his colleagues in the dominant media,
"They asked a lot of questions, but they asked even the right
questions of the wrong people." They were asked of the sources who had
cooked the intelligence books in the first place or who had memorized
the White House talking points and were prepared to answer every tough
question with a soft evasion or an easy lie, swallowed by a gullible
questioner.
Following the March 2003 invasion, Vice President Dick Cheney
dropped into a media dinner to thank the guests for their
all-the-war-all-the-time coverage of the contrived and manufactured
war.
Sadly, in many respects, the Fourth Estate has become the fifth
column of democracy, colluding with the powers that be in a culture of
deception that subverts the thing most necessary to freedom, and that
is the truth.
But we're not alone and we know what we need to say. So let us all
go tell it on the mountains and in the cities. From our websites and
laptops, the street corners and coffeehouses, the delis and diners,
the factory floors and the bookstores. On campus, at the mall, the
synagogue, sanctuary and mosque, let's tell it where we can, when we
can and while we still can.
Democracy only works when ordinary people claim it as their own.

